AMERICAN VISAS CHRONICLE

Chronicle Home

FALL 2004

Congress Snubs Bush's Immigration Plan
OMB Completes Final PERM Rule Review
USCIS To Implement H-1B Visa Reform Act Of 2004
"Conrad 30" J Waiver Program Extended And Modified
President Bush Signed The Omnibus Appropriations Bill (H.R. 4818).
New Fee's For H-1B and L's
IRS Statement On Delays In Issuing Social Security Numbers.
Poor Leadership At ICE Cited As Security Threat
USCIS Announces New H-1B Procedures – Reaches Cap
Columbia Grants Immigration To Gay Foreign Partners
Immigration Accord Seen By Hutchison, Mexican Official
House, Senate Each Pass Bills To Extend J Waiver Program For Physicians
Reminders On VWP Machine Readable Passport Requirements
Bush Revives Bid To Legalize Illegal Aliens
DV2006 Lottery Registration To Begin November 5
Bush Would Raise Legal Immigration; Kerry Is More Liberal On Amnesty.
H1-B Visa Cap Met in One Day
L & H-1B Amendment To The Fiscal 2005 Omnibus Appropriations Bill (H.R. 4818)

 

 

 

L & H-1B Amendment To The Fiscal 2005 Omnibus Appropriations Bill (H.R. 4818)
(The amendment would exempt from the cap 20,000 H-1Bs with advanced degrees from U.S. Universities; increase fees; adjust the prevailing wage calculation; modify DOL investigations and reform the L-1B program. After a technical modification, the bill is expected to be presented to the President for signature)

Section-by-Section Summary

L-1 Visa Reform

Section 11: Short Title-"L-1 Visa (Intracompany Transferee) Reform Act of 2004"

Section 12: Non immigrant L-1 Visa Category

This section modifies the INA § 214(c)(2) to prevent an L-1B visa holder from being primarily stationed at the worksite of another employer in cases where:

(1) The L-1B visa holder will be controlled and supervised by an unaffiliated employer, or
(2) The placement of the L-1B visa holder at the third party site is part of an arrangement to provide labor for the third party rather than placement at the third party site in connection with the provision of a product or service involving specialized knowledge specific to the petitioning employer.

The above modification to the law applies to initial, extended or amended petitions filed on or after the effective date.

Section 13: Requirement for prior continuous employment for certain intracompany transferees

This section strikes from INA § 214(c)(2)(A) the provision permitting the six-month work requirement for L-1 blanket petitions. The modification made by this section applies only to petitions for initial classification filed on or after the effective date of the subtitle.

Section 14: Maintenance of Statistics by the Department of Homeland Security

This section mandates that DHS maintains statistics for L-1 petitions filed on or after the effective date. Statistics will be gathered on the following:

 

USCIS Announces New H-1B Procedures – Reaches Cap
Washington, D.C.– U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced today that it has received
enough H-1B petitions to meet the congressionally-mandated cap for fiscal year 2005. Congress has set an
annual H-1B cap of 65,000 of which 6,800 are set aside for the H-1B1 program under terms of the U.S.-Chile
and U.S.-Singapore Free Trade Agreements. The total H-1B cap number available for FY 2005 is therefore
58,200. USCIS has factored into its count of petitions subject to the FY05 cap the number of Chile/Singapore
set-asides that were unused in FY2004 and any other cases that can be counted against the previous fiscal year’s
H-1B cap rather than the FY 2005 cap. USCIS has received enough petitions to reach the limit for FY 2005.
After today, USCIS will not accept any new H-1B petitions that are subject to the FY 2005 annual cap.
For the remainder of FY 2005, USCIS will follow the procedures set forth in the notice published on
February 25, 2004 in the Federal Register at 69 FR 8675 to address the cap reached during FY 2004. Those
procedures include:
· USCIS will process all petitions filed for first-time employment received by the end of business today.
· USCIS will return all petitions for first-time employment subject to the annual cap received after the end
of business today.
· Returned petitions will be accompanied by the filing fee.
· Petitioners may re-submit their petitions when H-1B visas become available for FY 2006.
· The earliest date a petitioner may file a petition requesting FY 2006 H-1B employment with an
employment start date of October 1, 2005, would be April 1, 2005.
USCIS plans to provide further details on these procedures in a new notice that will be published in the Federal
Register shortly.
Petitions for current H-1B workers do not count towards the congressionally mandated H-1B cap. Accordingly,
USCIS will continue to process petitions filed to:
· Extend the amount of time a current H-1B worker may remain in the United States
· Change the terms of employment for current H-1B workers
· Allow current H-1B workers to change employers
· Allow current H-1B workers to work concurrently in a second H-1B position
USCIS also notes that petitions for new H-1B employment are not subject to the annual cap if the alien will be
employed at an institution of higher education or a related or affiliated nonprofit entity, or at a nonprofit
research organization or a governmental research organization.

Bush Would Raise Legal Immigration; Kerry Is More Liberal On Amnesty.
WASHINGTON -- Every day they come. >From Mexico and Nicaragua. From China and India. From the Middle East and Africa. Illegal immigrants. Hundreds enter the United States daily. Sometimes thousands.
There are at least 8 million illegal aliens living in America today - and their numbers are growing by at least 400,000 a year. Maybe 500,000. No one knows for sure.
The growing number of foreigners who violate American immigration laws, sometimes with the aid of smugglers, has begun to rattle politicians and roil public opinion. Illegal residents are so plentiful they are hard to miss in states like California, Texas, Arizona, and more recently Virginia and Maryland.
In Northern Virginia, the recent rise of criminal gangs, populated by immigrants smuggled from Central America, has sent a wave of concern through middle-class suburbs. In Arizona, anger over use of costly public services by illegal aliens has led to a statewide vote next week on Proposition 200, which would require local governments to verify the immigration status of applicants.
George W. Bush and John Kerry came face to face with the mounting worries over immigration during their final presidential debate. Moderator Bob Schieffer of CBS News noted that thousands 'cross our borders illegally every day,' and that prior to the debate he 'got more e-mail' on immigration than any other issue.
Mr. Schieffer noted that illegal immigration is a security issue (terrorists have entered the country unlawfully in the past). It's an economic issue (a report to be issued this week will show that immigrants are taking jobs away from US citizens). It's a human rights issue (does the world's richest nation have an obligation to help people from poorer nations by opening its doors wider?).
Public opinion on this issue diverges from the positions of both President Bush and Senator Kerry. Neither presidential candidate calls for a slowdown on legal immigration. Yet a Gallup poll earlier this year found that 49 percent of Americans prefer a decrease in legal immigration, while only 8 percent want an increase of the kind supported by Mr. Bush.
It is illegal immigrants, however, who raise the most concern among many voters, as well as security experts. The 9/11 commission, in its 567-page report on the terrorist attacks on the Twin Towers and the Pentagon, noted that in an age of terrorism, 'the challenge for national security is to prevent the very few people who may pose overwhelming risks from entering ... the United States undetected.' Until recently, border control 'was not seen as a national security matter,' the commission said.
Senator Kerry claims 'the borders are more leak[y] today than they were before 9/11. The fact is, we haven't done what we need to do to toughen up our borders. And I will.' At the same time, Kerry promises to help illegal aliens who are already here. He vows within 100 days of taking office to rush through legislation that would allow millions of people who have already entered the US illegally to move toward legal status - a move that President Bush quickly criticized as 'amnesty.'
The president denies that his own plan for undocumented workers is amnesty, but critics say it could lead to the same result. Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, says of Bush and Kerry: 'As far as the parts of their immigration plans that are most often discussed, there is no difference. They both favor amnesty for illegal immigration. Bush says his is not, but that is just 'spin.' Kerry would give illegal immigrants green cards right away, while Bush's is a two-step, dragged out, but it is still an amnesty.'
Give us your huddled masses...
The US has a long history of immigration, symbolized by the Statue of Liberty. Over the past two centuries, America accepted tens of millions of immigrants from around the world. As a rule, the US has been the most generous in the world toward immigrants. In the 19th and early 20th centuries, most newcomers arrived from European nations such as Ireland, Britain, Italy, Germany, Poland, and the Scandinavian nations. In the 1960s, the laws changed to facilitate widespread legal migration from Latin America and Asia.
The greatest numbers today come from Mexico. Even with these higher quotas for Latin Americans, however, the pressure has grown substantially on the US southern border in the past 20 years.
While both major party candidates support somewhat similar immigration policies, advocates on this issue see important differences. The American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA), which supports greater immigration, comes down strongly in favor of the Kerry positions. Jeanne Butterfield, executive director of the AILA, complains that while Bush talks about a wide-ranging temporary worker program for illegal immigrants, no legislative proposals have been put forth during his nearly four years in office.
Nor has Bush worked to support either the Dream Act or the AgJobs Act, which the lawyers association favors, she says. The Dream Act, spearheaded by Sen. Orrin Hatch (R) of Utah, would aid students who are illegal immigrants and have graduated from US high schools. It would give them the right to compete with American students on an equal basis for slots at state colleges and universities. They would also qualify for lower, in-state tuition under the Hatch bill.
The AgJobs bill would provide a quick and easy avenue for illegal immigrants who work in agriculture to gain legal status. Once they can show that they have performed at least 100 days of agricultural work during a recent 12-month period, they would gain all the rights of a permanent lawful resident.
Kerry has indicated he would 'immediately sign' both of these bills if he became president. Further, the AILA, in a recent statement, characterized the Bush White House as 'restrictionist' and 'anti-immigrant' in its approach to immigration provisions in the intelligence reform bills now moving through Congress.
Dan Stein, executive director of the Federation for American Immigration Reform, says that while both major candidates have supported forms of amnesty for illegal immigrants, there are important differences. One is the difference between the Republican and Democratic parties. And this directly affects the candidates.
He says: 'The Republican voter base is adamantly opposed to amnesty. They are not interested in rewarding cheaters, or paying benefits to illegals for social services. Of course, the money [business] wing of the party has a very different view.'
The Democrats, meanwhile, are strongly influenced by various ethnic groups, and find it easier to support issues like amnesty, Mr. Stein observes. Even so, Stein noted approvingly that Kerry called for stronger defense of America's borders. And Kerry is the first Democratic candidate since Jimmy Carter to speak out in favor of sanctions (fines and other penalties) against US employers who hire illegal aliens. A law sharply penalizing firms for hiring undocumented workers was passed in 1986, but is seldom enforced.
Nuanced differences
Analysts say that the broad similarities between Bush and Kerry on immigration leave some voters without an easy choice on the issue, particularly if they favor lower levels of immigration and a get-tough approach to border enforcement. While Ms. Butterfield of the lawyers association asserts that Kerry is closer to a 'pro-immigration' candidate, Mr. Krikorian of the Center for Immigration Studies says that a Bush speech in January set forth an historic immigration agenda.
At that time, the president outlined a so-called 'guest worker' program that Krikorian says would open the floodgates to foreign workers. As he wrote in the National Review: 'Taking [Bush] at his word would suggest a return to 19th-century unlimited immigration, with the American labor market open to the world's other 6 billion people. And ... this seems to be the objective.' He added that this 'would inevitably drive down wages and benefits for Americans, creating ever more 'jobs American's won't do.' The White House seems to view immigration as similar to trade, seeking a market-driven system that allows free movement of people.'

Immigration Accord Seen By Hutchison, Mexican Official
AUSTIN -- Flanked by Mexican Foreign Minister Luis Ernesto Derbez, U.S. Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison on Thursday said reviving an immigration agreement with Mexico will be among the top priorities for President Bush during his second term.
Derbez, responding to a question, said those 'discussions have already begun,' indicating the topic of an immigration accord was broached during a brief early-morning phone conversation Wednesday between Mexican President Vicente Fox and Bush hours before the U.S. president acknowledged his victory against Sen. John Kerry.
Saying Fox had called Bush at 7 a.m. to congratulate him on his re-election, Derbez said in Spanish that the two leaders 'talked about their mutual agenda and agreed to initiate high-priority talks, especially with respect to immigration.'
The U.S.-educated diplomat said both men agreed that 'reforming a migration accord will receive high consideration' when the two leaders are scheduled to meet at a conference in Santiago, Chile, on Nov. 19 and 20.
Later, speaking in English to a reporter, Derbez noted that 'we appear to be moving in the right direction, but in the end, (immigration) is a U.S. issue and (a Bush immigration plan) is one that will have to be worked out between the (U.S.) Congress and the White House.'
Hutchison, a Texas Republican, invited Derbez and U.S. Commerce Secretary Don Evans to give the inaugural talk at the Kay Bailey Hutchison Chair in Latin American Law at the University of Texas at Austin law school.
The academic chair's goal, she said, will be to enhance academic collaboration and create a center to foster research on international relations, trade and investment in the Americas and Latin American law.
In introducing Derbez, Hutchison said 'there is a sense of urgency to deal with the (immigration) issue, and I believe that with the president's resounding victory, his next four years will give him the chance to do what he intended to do before 9-11.'
Bush and Fox were said to have been working on a guest worker program that would have allowed Mexican workers to legally reside and work in the United States for a specific period of time, between three to six years, before returning to Mexico.
But 9-11 and the resulting emphasis on homeland security shelved those plans.
'The devil is in the details,' Hutchison said. 'But I do believe that (Bush) will have as his priority to ... have a worker program that will permit a free flow (of workers) across the border, but one that will have to mesh workers' needs with our homeland security needs, and that will take time.'
She noted that whatever program might be adopted by Congress may not resemble the specific plan Bush envisioned early in his first administration.

 

House, Senate Each Pass Bills To Extend J Waiver Program For Physicians

 On Oct. 18th, 2004, the House and the Senate each passed legislation that would extend and modify the J waiver program for foreign-born physicians. Under the program, aliens who participate in medical residencies in the United States on exchange program (J) visas are exempted from the two-year foreign residence requirement of INA § 212(e) if they agree to practice medicine for three years in an area designated by the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) as having a shortage of health care professionals.

The program has been extended several times, most recently via the 21st Century Department of Justice Appropriations Authorization Act (Pub. L. No. 107-273, § 11018 (2002)), which extended the program until June 1, 2004. The House bill (H.R. 4453) as introduced would have extended the waiver for a year and clarified the practice of allowing foreign doctors receiving a waiver to receive H-1B nonimmigrant status regardless of the annual H-1B visa quota. At the full Committee markup, Representatives John Hostettler (R-IN) and Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX) offered an amendment in the nature of a substitute that would extend the program until June 1, 2006, specify that the H-1B cap exemption would apply to doctors who were sponsored for a waiver by either a state or federal agency, allow foreign doctors receiving a waiver to work in medically-underserved areas in either primary care or specialty medicine, and allow five of each state’s 30 waivers to go to doctors that would practice medicine in areas not designated by the Secretary of HHS as having a shortage of health care professionals, if the doctors receiving the waivers would practice in facilities that serve patients who reside in areas designated by the Secretary as having a shortage of health care professionals.The Committee adopted the Hostettler-Jackson Lee amendment in the nature of a substitute, and the bill as reported out of Committee reflected that text. The House, on October 6, passed the measure without change by voice vote under suspension of the rules. The Senate passed a nearly identical bill on October 11 (S. 2302). The Senate version differs slightly from the House measure in that it would require federal or state agencies requesting a waiver for a specialist to demonstrate a shortage of doctors able to provide the appropriate medical specialty in the designated geographical area.  According to Senate sources, staffers currently are working toward crafting the necessary agreements to have the Senate version of the bill adopted by the House during the upcoming lame duck session

 

Reminders On VWP Machine Readable Passport Requirements
Effective October 26, 2004, travelers applying for admission under the Visa Waiver Program (VWP) pursuant to section 217 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) must be in possession of a machine-readable passport (MRP).  As an alternative, travelers may obtain a non-immigrant visa in their current (non-machine-readable) passport.  

If, after October 26, 2004, a Visa Waiver Program national presents him or herself for admission to the United States without a machine-readable passport or non-immigrant visa, a Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officer is permitted to grant a one-time exemption to admit the traveler to the United States.  The traveler will be issued a letter explaining the U.S. entry requirements and his or her passport will be annotated that a one-time exemption has been granted. If a traveler fails to obtain a machine-readable passport or a nonimmigrant visa for subsequent visits, she or he may be refused entry under the VWP.

Travelers who receive an exemption and make an incidental trip to Canada, Mexico, or the adjacent islands as part of their trip to the United States, should be advised that the exemption is applied for one entry in the U.S. only.   Once they leave the United States, they may not be allowed to reenter without an MRP, despite the exemption on their I-94.

A number of factors may impact compliance with this requirement and will be considered regarding one-time exemptions:

  • Although outreach efforts have been made to advise travelers of this requirement, not all visa waiver travelers may be aware or may be confused by the various provisions.
  • Each VWP applicant must now present an individual passport.  Some family groups that list minor children on one of the parent’s passports may be adversely affected.  Families are encouraged to obtain individual machine-readable passports prior to travel.
  • Some countries do not issue official or diplomatic MRPs.  Diplomats or Government Officials who are on travel for government business will have a nonimmigrant visa with an “A-1 or A-2” classification and do not qualify for admission under the VWP.  
  • Travelers who apply for entry into the U.S. at an airport with a non-machine-readable passport for the purpose of departing on a cruise that makes multiple stops at various U.S. ports may be considered again for a one-time exemption at each successive location during their trip if they can establish continuous travel from the arrival through the period of the cruise and ultimate departure.

For a period of six (6) months beginning October 26, 2004 until April 25, 2005, CBP will not impose a fine on the transportation carriers (under Section 273(a)(1) INA) for bringing to the United States any traveler who is a national of any one of twenty-two (22) designated countries applying for admission under the VWP without an MRP. The 22 countries are: Austria, Australia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, Monaco, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, San Marino, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom.  

As of October 1, 2003, nationals of the following four countries were required to present an MRP for admission under the VWP: Andorra, Brunei, Liechtenstein, and Slovenia.  Effective on that date, transportation carriers were liable for transporting nationals of these countries to the United States for admission under the VWP without an MRP.  This new procedure will not affect that policy, and CBP will continue to impose a fine in those circumstances.  

As of May 16, 2003, nationals of Belgium were required to present an MRP for admission under the VWP.  Effective on that date, transportation carriers were liable for transporting these persons to the United States for admission under the VWP without an MRP.  This new procedure will not affect that policy and CBP will continue to impose a fine in these circumstances.

 

Bush Revives Bid To Legalize Illegal Aliens

President Bush yesterday moved aggressively to resurrect his plan to relax rules against illegal immigration, a move bound to anger conservatives just days after they helped re-elect him.
The president met privately in the Oval Office with Sen. John McCain to discuss jump-starting a stalled White House initiative that would grant legal status to millions of immigrants who broke the law to enter the United States.
The Arizona Republican is one of the Senate's most outspoken supporters of expanding guest-worker programs and has introduced his own bill to offer a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants.
'We are formulating plans for the legislative agenda for next year,' said White House political strategist Karl Rove. 'And immigration will be on that agenda.'
He added: 'The president had a meeting this morning to discuss with a significant member of the Senate the prospect of immigration reform. And he's going to make it an important item.'
While the president was huddling with Mr. McCain, Secretary of State Colin L. Powell was pushing the plan during a visit to Mexico City.
'The president remains committed to comprehensive immigration reform as a high priority in his second term,' he told a meeting of the U.S.-Mexico Binational Commission. 'We will work closely with our Congress to achieve this goal.'
But key opponents in Congress said Mr. Bush's proposal isn't going anywhere.
'An amnesty by any other name is still an amnesty, regardless of what the White House wants to call it,' said Rep. Tom Tancredo, Colorado Republican and chairman of the Congressional Immigration Reform Caucus.
'Their amnesty plan was dead on arrival when they sent it to the Congress in January, and if they send the same pig with lipstick back to Congress next January, it will suffer the same fate,' he said.
With the House and Senate already clashing over border security and deportation provisions in the pending intelligence overhaul bill, some Capitol Hill aides said it's almost impossible that Congress could agree on a broader immigration proposal.
Dan Stein, president of the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), said he 'suddenly went from calm to stressed out' after learning of the president's renewed push for immigration relaxation.
He predicted the plan would continue to meet vigorous opposition from House Republicans.
'If the House wouldn't deliver this bill before the guy's election, when he claimed he needed it for the Hispanic vote, why would they deliver it after the election, when their constituents overwhelmingly oppose it?' he said. 'Why would House leaders follow the president over a cliff?'
White House officials insisted the move was not 'payback' to Hispanic voters who supported Mr. Bush in greater numbers last week than in 2000. Although the president first proposed relaxing immigration shortly after taking office, he mothballed the idea after September 11, 2001, and downplayed it on the campaign trail.
'The president has long believed that reforming our immigration system is a high priority,' White House deputy press secretary Claire Buchan said yesterday.
Mr. Stein said Mr. Bush is already a 'lame duck president' whose proposal 'has no credibility.' He expressed astonishment that the president resurrected the plan before pushing other second-term agenda items, like tax simplification or Social Security privatization.
'There's a sense of obstinacy in the face of overwhelming evidence that it's a losing approach,' he said. 'I mean, the definition of insanity is to keep doing the same thing, expecting a different result.'
Though most members of Congress agree on the need for a guest-worker program to fill unwanted jobs, House Republican leaders, including Majority Leader Tom DeLay, Texas Republican, have panned other parts of the president's proposal as an amnesty.
Mr. Bush has not sent immigration legislation to Congress, though seven bills have been introduced by members of the House and Senate, according to Numbers USA, an organization that lobbies for stricter immigration controls.
They range from a proposal to give legal status to fewer than 1 million agricultural workers to a bill that could legalize most of the estimated 10 million illegal immigrants currently living in the United States. But none of the bills has passed even one chamber.
Mr. McCain is sponsoring a bill, along with Reps. Jim Kolbe and Jeff Flake, both Arizona Republicans, that would go further than the president's principles by explicitly allowing those now here illegally to enter a guest-worker program and eventually apply for permanent residence.
White House press secretary Scott McClellan said the president wants to 'provide a more humane treatment' of illegal aliens from Mexico.
'America has always been a welcoming society, and this is a program that will match willing workers with willing employers,' he said. 'It will promote compassion for workers who right now have no protection.'
He added of Mr. Bush: 'It's something that he intends to work with members on to get moving again in the second term. It's something he believes very strongly in.'
Mr. Powell yesterday insisted that security is an important part of his boss's proposal.
'We must also be innovative in our efforts to stop those who abuse the openness of our societies along the border, who would use this openness to harm our citizens through trafficking in drugs, or trafficking in human beings, or by committing acts of terrorism,' Mr. Powell said.
Some on Capitol Hill said Mr. Bush may be emboldened by the fact that he didn't appear to lose support among conservatives in this year's election, and several Republicans who did support guest-worker programs defeated primary challengers, including Mr. Flake, Mr. Kolbe and Rep. Christopher B. Cannon, Utah Republican.
'I think a lot of members around the country saw those results and realized that voters are more interested in a serious solution to this problem,' said Mr. Flake's spokesman, Matthew Specht. 'So I think that certainly improves the chances for reform next year.'
In a 90-minute interview Sept. 22 with editors and reporters of The Washington Times, Mr. Rove said a Bush victory would 'be an opportunity' for the president's guest-worker proposal for immigrants, although he declined to call it a 'mandate,' as he did on such issues as Social Security reform and tax cuts.

DV2006 Lottery Registration To Begin November 5

The State Department announced on September 29, 2004, that the registration period for the DV2006 visa lottery will run from November 5, 2004 to January 7, 2005. Registration will be exclusively on-line


Columbia Grants Immigration To Gay Foreign Partners
SUNNYVALE, Calif. -- Love Sees No Borders, an organization focused on raising awareness of same-sex binational couples and their fight to remain together, today hailed the decision of the Colombian Constitutional Court granting residency to the same-sex foreign partner of a citizen.
'This court decision is historic in Colombia, even though it just applies to this particular couple for now,' said Andres Duque, a Colombian activist in New York City, and director of the Latino LGBT group Mano a Mano. 'We are hopeful that immigration authorities realize the grave need that exists for partner sponsorship and that this ruling is turned into national law.'
According to the Caracol News Network, the unprecedented decision involves a couple from the island of San Andres. The couple asked the local government for special residency permission for the foreign partner, and was denied under the argument that this kind of benefit only applies to unions formed by one man and one woman.
On a higher-court appeal filed by renowned Colombian attorney German Humberto Rincon Perfetti, the Constitutional Court reaffirmed Colombian couple's right to due process and free development of their personality. According to the Court the local 'administrative decision created an obstacle to the decision of maintaining a stable relationship as a homosexual couple,' and this is why residency was granted.
'We are hopeful that Colombia extends this vital benefit to all its citizens,' said Leslie Bulbuk, co-founder of Love Sees no Borders. 'It is also worth mentioning that now three countries in the Americas have recognized the need to grant recognition to same-sex couples for immigration purposes. Sadly the United States is not one of them.'
Currently 16 countries have laws that allow citizens to sponsor a same-sex foreign partner for immigration: Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Israel, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, South Africa, Sweden and the United Kingdom. The Permanent Partners Immigration Act (PPIA, HR 832, S.1510) would allow Americans and legal permanent residents to sponsor a same-sex foreign partner for immigration.


H1-B Visa Cap Met in One Day
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Immigration officials have a message for employers hoping to hire foreign workers through the H1-B visa program for the fiscal year that began Friday: It's too late.
The popular visas are granted to foreigners in specialty professions such as architecture, engineering, medicine and computer programming. H1-B visas are good for up to six years.
Congress set a cap of 65,000 such visas per fiscal year. By the end the work day Friday, Citizenship and Immigration Services already had received enough applications to meet the limit.
Agency spokesman William Strassberger said applications filed by Friday will be considered. For any after that, 'It's too late,' he said.
Under the H-1B program, U.S. employers must pay foreign workers the prevailing wage for their job fields and show that qualified U.S. workers are not being passed over. The foreign worker must have at least a bachelor's degree or the equivalent.
Unions and other critics say the program allows businesses to fill jobs with cheaper foreign labor, but those that use the program say they can't find enough Americans with the necessary math, science and engineering skills.
Sensitivity about exporting American jobs overseas has made Congress reluctant to raise the cap.
Congress last raised the cap in 2000, when the country was enjoying a technology-propelled boom. The H1-B worker limit rose to 195,000, but it fell back to 65,000 last year.
Of the 65,000 visas available, 6,800 are set aside for workers from Chile and Singapore under terms of free trade agreements with those countries.
'A cap never has been set that reflects anything in our economy. It's always been a political number,' said Theresa Brown, director of immigration policy for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Companies have hit the cap several times over the years, she said.
'We've got to have a better system than that,' Brown said.
Employers hope to get relief from a proposal being pushed by Sen. Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga., and Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas. They are proposing that foreign students graduating from master's or doctoral programs at U.S. universities not be counted against the H1-B limit. Such students often are recruited by U.S. businesses and could end up working for global competitors when H1-B visas are unavailable.
It is unclear whether Congress will consider the proposal before adjourning.

 

Poor Leadership At ICE Cited As Security Threat

The Washington Times

U.S. Customs and Immigration Enforcement's ability to gather and share intelligence data, conduct the investigations needed to guard the nation's borders against terrorists and enforce immigration law is being challenged by a growing number of ICE supervisors and agents.

Both supervisory and rank_and_file personnel, in numerous interviews, said the Department of Homeland Security agency is overwhelmed by low morale, mismanagement and the lack of a clearly defined mission, and said the lack of effective leadership threatens its ability to defend the United States against a new terrorist attack.

At least two congressional committees are reviewing the accusations and have met with ICE supervisors and agents to discuss the matter.

'Serious accusations have been made and there is a concerted effort under way to determine their validity and, more importantly, find out how they impact the country's ability to fight the war on terrorism,' said one congressional investigator. 'The complaints are specific and widespread. We take them seriously.'

ICE supervisors and agents say they are worried about, among other things, management decisions that have muddled long_standing chains of command; the assignment of patrol agents and inspectors to one agency and investigators to another; and the misuse of computer systems that had been effective for everything from inspections, investigations and data collection to in_house networking and personnel matters.

They questioned whether ICE has sought to maintain the legacy of its predecessor, the U.S. Customs Service, which developed an expertise in smuggling and money_laundering investigations, and said they doubted the new agency is committed to enforcing immigration law, particularly in the nation's interior, where 10 million illegals live.

Less than two years after ICE was created, discontent among supervisors and rank_and_file agents has spread from quiet chatter in locker rooms and patrol vehicles to open rebellion in its field and regional offices.

Letters and e_mails sent by ICE personnel to members of Congress show that many think significant leadership shortfalls have translated into low morale.

One e_mail delivered to congressional investigators said field agents 'desperately require a set of goals that relate to terrorist investigations and protecting our borders,' but because the ICE leadership has failed to accomplish that goal in the 20 months since the agency was created, they have 'no respect or confidence in their ability to do so.'

Much of the criticism targets Asa Hutchinson, Homeland Security undersecretary for border and transportation security, who oversees ICE, and ICE Assistant Secretary Michael J. Garcia, who heads the agency.

The supervisors and agents said the two had done little to help the complicated reorganization of several law_enforcement agencies into a single body, while others said they let the agency's investigative functions erode, even though ICE is billed as the investigative arm of Homeland Security.

Mr. Hutchinson has said ICE has made 'great strides,' despite problems associated with the complex merger of agencies. Mr. Garcia described the transition as 'unprecedented,' saying that regardless of a lack of adequate funding for manpower, resources and equipment, he was confident ICE was moving forward.

'It has taken time to find out ICE's role in preventing a new act of terrorism, where we fit in the overall picture, how we learn and adapt, what tools we need to get the job done, and how to use them more aggressively,' Mr. Garcia said. 'But look at the service they have performed despite those uncertainties. We have come a very long way in a very short time.'

But an ICE supervisor who heads a major field office said agents assigned to combat terrorism think the dismantling of Customs has led to a serious breach of national security, one that top department officials have yet to address. He said at a time that Customs and the FBI were seeking to allow a freer flow of intelligence data, Homeland Security 'is erecting walls and roadblocks between itself.'

Matthew L. Issman, national legislative vice president of the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association (FLEOA), which represents 25,000 federal agents in 57 agencies, including those at ICE, said that major 'systemic issues and concerns' raised by agents and forwarded to members of Congress show the agency is suffering from a serious morale problem.

Mr. Issman said hundreds of agents transferred from Customs to ICE were 'deeply troubled' by the merger and by what they overwhelmingly described as a system that has failed to provide adequate leadership.

In a letter to Sen. Charles E. Grassley, Iowa Republican and chairman of the powerful Senate Finance Committee, Mr. Issman said ICE's creation had 'separated and distanced investigators from the field entities that are on the front lines every day.'

'This is akin to removing the detectives from the police department in your hometown, and creating another distant layer of bureaucracy that separates their chain of command, identity and esprit de corp, and then expects them to interact efficiently as if the new wall was not there,' he said.

In a separate letter, Allen Martin, another FLEOA official, told Sen. Orrin G. Hatch, Utah Republican and chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, that 'morale in the field is at an all_time low and there is a real lack of identity, mission focus and direction.'

Mr. Martin said the ICE leadership had transformed an agency from 'a paperless trendsetter in the computer age, back to the Stone Age,' adding that he has 'received an increasing amount of letters from field agents claiming the merger is not working at their level.'

He also said the agents are 'too scared' to publicly challenge the management, so they write to FLEOA, saying the merger had significantly damaged the ability of former Customs investigators to conduct probes.

In one letter, an ICE supervisor said the agency is 'so unwieldy that it's now an object of laughter — even among some of our most important clients, such as the U.S. attorneys.'

Another letter called ICE 'ill_conceived, a Pavlovian response to a problem that Customs never created.'

Mr. Issman also noted that fiscal mismanagement at ICE had resulted in the cancellation of basic_ and advanced_training classes and a hiring freeze, adding that although agents 'could not buy AA pager batteries in the last few weeks of fiscal 2004 or travel on government business, ICE Detention and Removal officials got a blocking code removed from their government purchase cards so they could continue to rent DVDs for detained immigrants.'

ICE was created March 1, 2003, with the merger of U.S. Customs, the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service and the Federal Protective Service. With a work force of nearly 15,000, it is one of the largest law_enforcement agencies in the federal government.

Its mission ranges from terrorist financing, money laundering and illegal arms dealing to immigration fraud, illegal aliens and migrant smuggling. It also is responsible for the apprehension and removal of thousands of criminal aliens and 'absconders' in the United States.

Hampered by a lack of adequate funding in fiscal 2004, including significant budget shortfalls this year explained by the agency as accounting problems, the ICE budget for fiscal 2005 is $4.01 billion _ up about $300 million. Mr. Garcia, who told employees in a Sept. 3 e_mail there was a need for deeper cuts 'to ensure we operate within our budget while continuing to direct resources towards our national security missions,' said the increases would help secure the agency's role in 'ensuring the security of the American people and our way of life.'

Numerous ICE supervisors familiar with the budget process said the new budget has significant deficits built in, but were not eager to talk about the matter, for fear of retaliation.

'I've heard nothing but bad things happening to people who speak out,' one supervisor said. 'There's a lot of senior management that wants to keep the lid on people speaking out about the problems. If we're identified, they could do a number of things to us ... and you don't have any way of fighting it.'

The supervisors and agents noted that the ICE management is made up of former INS officials, including Mr. Garcia, whose failed financial systems were documented almost yearly by the Justice Department's Office of Inspector General.

'Now that same mind_set is being used to run ICE into financial ruin, and when the dust settles after the election, Garcia, Hutchinson, [Homeland Security Secretary] Tom Ridge and others will be gone, and we will be left to rebuild the ruins,' one agent said.

A major area of contention continues to be a May 13, 2003, memorandum of agreement sought by Attorney General John Ashcroft and approved by Mr. Ridge. It moved the nation's most successful terrorism_related financial crimes task force from U.S. Customs to the FBI.

'If ICE is the investigative arm of Homeland Security, how is it they would have allowed the FBI to take over these important terrorism_related cases without a note of protest?' asked an ICE supervisor, noting that Operation Green Quest, during its 19 months at Customs, made 79 arrests and seized $33 million.

Several ICE supervisors and agents independently cited as an example of the agency's demise its forced acceptance of a huge backlog of INS cases involving the handling of illegal aliens, known as 'bagging and tagging.'

They said two experienced Customs investigators _ now at ICE _ were pulled off a criminal case to guard for three days an illegal alien until he signed a pledge to show up for an immigration hearing in four months.

'So he signs a piece of paper and leaves, and we all know we won't ever see him again. We tied up all these resources for nothing,' they said.

Meanwhile, they said, ICE has committed millions of dollars and untold resources and manpower to arrest more than 4,400 people nationwide since March 2003 as suspected pedophiles _ fewer than half of whom have been deported as foreign national sexual predators.

'It's good to get these people off the street, but they're not terrorists and that's not what we're supposed to be doing,' said one agent. 'But it's big numbers and these folks seem to like big numbers.'

IRS Statement On Delays In Issuing Social Security Numbers.

Sometimes aliens experience significant delays in obtaining social security numbers. The consequences of these delays are discussed below.

There is no federal law administered by any federal agency which prohibits the hiring of a person based solely on the fact that the person does not have a Social Security Number (SSN). Similarly, there is no federal law which prohibits the making of a payment to a person based solely on the fact that the person does not have an SSN.

However, there are federal laws and regulations which require the reporting of a payee's TIN (Taxpayer Identification Number--SSN or ITIN) on federal information returns and payee statements such as forms W-2, 1099, 1042-S, etc. In addition, federal regulations require (with a few exceptions) that all tax treaty claims made on Forms 8233, W-8BEN, or W-9 be accompanied by the beneficial owner's TIN.

The IRS is quite aware of the Social Security Administration's new procedures effective since 09-30-2002 about not issuing an SSN to any alien for whom it cannot confirm his identity and immigration status from the USCIS (United States Citizenship and Immigration Services—formerly the INS). In addition, the IRS is quite aware of the delays in securing an SSN which these new procedures will cause many aliens. Furthermore, in the situation in which an alien is work-authorized under the immigration law and is eligible to request an SSN, but who is experiencing delays in securing an SSN caused by the SSA's new procedures, the IRS will not issue an ITIN (Individual Taxpayer Identification Number) to such an alien.

With respect to IRS penalties related to the payor's failure to furnish a payee TIN on an information return and on a payee statement, the fact that the payor does not have a payee TIN to report because the SSA is delaying an issuance of an SSN to a work-authorized alien solely because of its new procedures, will cause the IRS to be quite favorable toward considering this situation one in which "reasonable cause" exists for not asserting such penalties. The payor should keep documentation to show that his failure to supply a payee TIN is caused solely by the SSA's new procedures for issuing SSN's to aliens.

However, please remember the following two points:

  1. A Form W-4 submitted to an employer which does not report the employee's SSN is an invalid form W-4, and the employer is required to withhold on the employee's wages at the rates corresponding to Single filing status, zero personal exemptions allowed. Withholding at these rates must continue until the employee submits a proper Form W-4 reporting his SSN.
  2. Any withholding agent (with certain exceptions) who receives a Form 8233, W-8BEN, or W-9 without a payee TIN for the purpose of claiming a tax treaty benefit is not allowed to grant such tax treaty benefit until he receives a proper Form 8233, W-8BEN, or W-9 which does report the payee's TIN. However, a form 8233 or W-8BEN without a payee TIN is still valid for the purpose of declaring that the payee is a foreign person, subject to the withholding and reporting rules which apply to payments made to foreign persons.

The IRS cannot speak to the issue of potential penalties which could be imposed by other federal, state, or local agencies for the failure of an employer or payor to report a payee's TIN on any required documents, except to note that the filing of the immigration Form I-9 without an SSN does not constitute grounds, in and of itself, to reject the validity of the Form I-9. If an alien employee can prove his work-eligibility with documents listed on Form I-9 other than a U.S. social security card, then the alien's Form I-9, even though submitted without an SSN, is valid under the immigration law.

New Fee's For H-1B and L's

The H-1B provisions of the Omnibus Appropriations Act reinstitutes the ACWIA fee and raises it to $1,500. Petitioners who employ no more than 25 full-time equivalent employees, including any affiliate or subsidiary, may submit a reduced fee of $750. Certain types of petitions, that were previously exempt from the $1,000 fee, are still exempt from the new $1,500 and $750 fee. The new $1,500 and $750 fee applies to any non-exempt petitions filed with USCIS after December 8, 2004.

In addition, the Act creates a new Fraud Prevention and Detection Fee of $500 which must be paid by petitioners seeking a beneficiary’s initial grant of H-1B or L nonimmigrant classification or those petitioners seeking to change a beneficiary’s employer within those classifications. Other than petitions to amend or extend stay filed by an existing H-1B or L employer, there are no exemptions from the $500 fee. The new $500 fee applies to petitions filed with USCIS on or after March 8, 2005.

President Bush Signed The Omnibus Appropriations Bill (H.R. 4818).

Below is Section-by-Section Summary of the L & H-1B Amendments contained in the Bill.

Subtitle A-- L-1 Visa Reform

Section 411: Short Title-"L-1 Visa (Intracompany Transferee) Reform Act of 2004"

Section 412: Non immigrant L-1 Visa Category

This section modifies the INA § 214(c)(2) to prevent an L-1 visa holder from being primarily stationed at the worksite of another employer in cases where:

(1) The L-1 visa holder will be controlled and supervised by an unaffiliated employer, or
(2) The placement of the L-1 visa holder at the third party site is part of an arrangement to provide labor for the third party rather than placement at the third party site in connection with the provision of a product or service involving specialized knowledge specific to the petitioning employer.

The above modification to the law applies to initial, extended or amended petitions filed on or after the effective date.

Section 413: Requirement for prior continuous employment for certain intracompany transferees

This section strikes from INA § 214(c)(2)(A) the provision permitting the six-month work requirement for L-1 blanket petitions. The modification made by this section applies only to petitions for initial classification filed on or after the effective date of the subtitle.

Section 414: Maintenance of Statistics by the Department of Homeland Security

This section mandates that DHS maintains statistics for L-1 petitions filed on or after the effective date. Statistics will be gathered on the following:

  • Number of nonimmigrants who are classified in the L-1B category; and
  • Number of L-1B nonimmigrants who will work primarily offsite.

    Section 415: Inspector General Report on L Visa ProgramNo later than 6 months after the date of enactment, the Inspector General (IG) of DHS shall examine and report to the House and Senate Judiciary committees on the vulnerabilities and the potential abuses in the L visa program.Section 416: Establishment of Task ForceThis section mandates the development of an L Visa Interagency Task Force no later than 6 months after the date of enactment of this act. Included in the task force are representatives from DHS, DOS, and DOJ. This task force shall report to the House and Senate Judiciary Committees on the efforts to implement the IG's recommendations set forth by the report mandated in section 415 above. The task force will also include recommendations to Congress, including suggestions for legislation. Section 417: Effective Date

    The subtitle and the Amendments made by the subtitle take effect 180 days after the date of enactment of the Act.

     

  • Subtitle B-- H-1B Visa Reform

    Section 421: Short Title-"The H-1B Visa Reform Act of 2004"

    Section 422: Temporary Worker Provision

    a) Removes the sunset provision from INA § 212(n)(1)(E)(ii) and makes permanent the provision requiring a non-displacement attestation on the LCA by employers who are H-1B dependant or have committed a willful failure or misrepresentation during the preceding 5 years.

    b) Modifies INA § 214(c)(9) by removing the sunset provision on the employer fees and making the fees permanent. This section also raises the fee for each petition from $1,000 to $1,500. Employers with no more than 25 full-time employees employed in the U.S. will only be responsible for ½ of the fee amount.

    Section 423: Prevailing Wage Level

    Modifies INA §212(p) to require employers to pay 100% of the prevailing wage. However, this section also mandates that where the DOL uses or makes available to employers a governmental survey to determine prevailing wage, such survey shall provide 4 levels of wages commensurate with experience, education, and the level of supervision. If a 2 level wage survey is used, this section provides a formula for calculating the 2 additional intermediate levels.

    Section 424: DOL Investigative Authorities

    a) Creates a new subsection (G) under INA §212(n)(2) to take affect as if enacted on October 1, 2003. The new subsection would:

      i) Reinstates and makes permanent the ability of DOL to initiate an investigation of an employer if there is reasonable cause that the employer is not in compliance with this subsection. The Secretary of Labor (or acting Secretary) must personally certify that reasonable cause exists and must approve the investigation. The investigation may be initiated for reasons other than completeness and obvious inaccuracies by the employer.

      ii) Permits the DOL to conduct an investigation if it receives credible information from a known source likely to have knowledge of an employer's practices or conditions. The information must provide reasonable cause that the employer has committed a willful failure to meet a condition, or has committed a substantial failure to meet a condition that affects multiple employers.

      iii) Directs the DOL to create procedures for providing information that may be used as the basis of an investigation.

      iv) An investigation under subsection (ii) must be from information that originates from a source other than DOL or was lawfully obtained by DOL during another DOL investigation.

      v) Information provided to the DOL by the employer for purposes of securing an H-1B employee shall not be considered a receipt of information under this subsection.

      vi) No investigation or related hearing may be conducted unless the information is received within 12 months after the date of the alleged failure.

      vii) Directs DOL to provide notice to an employer prior to the commencement of an investigation with limited exception.

      viii) An investigation by DOL may last for 60 days, and if there is evidence of a violation, DOL shall provide the employer with notice of the determination and an opportunity for a hearing. The hearing must take place within 120 days of the determination and a finding must be made within 120 days of the hearing.

    b) Good Faith Compliance-This section would modify INA §212(n)(2) so that an employer is deemed to have complied with the section, notwithstanding a technical or procedural failure to meet such requirements, if there was a good faith to comply with the requirements. This good faith clause shall not apply if DOL has explained the basis of the failure or if the employer has been given time to correct the failure and has failed to do so.

    Under this subsection, an employer will not be assessed fines or penalties for failure to pay the prevailing wage if he can establish that the manner in which the prevailing wage was calculated was consistent with recognized industry standards and practices.

    c) Secretary of Labor Report- by January 31 of each year, DOL shall report to the Senate and House Judiciary Committees on the investigations undertaken based on INA §212(n)(2)(G)(i) and (ii) as well as the expenditures by DOL in INA § 286(v)(2)(D).

    Section 425: Exemption of certain aliens from numerical limitations on H-1B nonimmigrants

    a) Modifies INA §214(g)(5) to include among the classes of H-1B exempted aliens an alien who has earned a Master's or higher degree from a U.S. institution of higher education. This exemption is capped at 20,000 per fiscal year.

    b) This section also requires DHS, for each fiscal year, to maintain the following statistical information on each alien who is issued a visa or otherwise provided nonimmigrant status and is exempt under INA § 214(g)(5): country of origin; occupation; education level maintained; compensation. The statistical information will be included in the annual report on H-1Bs.

    Section 426: Fraud Prevention and Detection Fee

    a) Adds to INA §214(c) a new $500 fraud fee. Such fee will be in addition to other fees and will apply to employers filing either an initial petition for an H-1B or L visa or for a change of status or change of employer petition. A $500 fraud fee will also be charged for an alien filing a visa application abroad for an L blanket petition. The fee will be imposed only on principal aliens.

    b)The money collected will be deposited in the "H-1B and L Fraud Prevention and Detection Account" and divided equally among DOS, DHS and DOL.

    c) Effective Date- the amendments in this section take effect on the date of enactment and the fees imposed apply to petitions and visa applications filed 90 days after the date of enactment.

    Section 427: Change of Fee Formula

    This section modifies the distribution of money in the H-1B nonimmigrant petitioner account as follows:

  • Job training- from 55% to 50%
  • Scholarship program- from 22% to 30%
  • National Science Foundation grant program for K-12 Math. Science and Technology education- from 15% to 10%
  • DHS processing from 4% to 5%
  • DOL processing maintained at 5%

    Section 428: Grants for Job Training for Employment in High Growth IndustriesModifies section 414 (c) of the American Competitiveness and Workforce Improvement Act (ACWIA) and re-authorizes DOL to award grants to provide job training for industries and economic sectors that are projected to experience significant growth.Section 429: National Science Foundation Low-Income Scholarship Program Modifies section 414(d) of ACWIA to allow the NSF to award scholarships for computer science or other technology or science programs. This section also increases the scholarship amount from $3,125 to $10,000. It also allows the NSF to use up to 50% of their funds for curriculum development, professional and workforce development, and other advance technological education.Section 430: Effective Dates

    Except as otherwise provided, the H-1B subtitle shall take effect 90 days after the date of enactment. However, sections 422(b), 426(a) and 427 take effect immediately.

    "Conrad 30" J Waiver Program Extended And Modified

    President Bush, on December 3rd, signed legislation that extends and modifies the “Conrad 30” J waiver program for foreign-born physicians (S. 2302, Pub. L. No. 108-441).The program has been extended several times, most recently via the 21st Century Department of Justice Appropriations Authorization Act (Pub. L. No. 107-273, § 11018 (2002)), which extended the program until June 1, 2004. S. 2302 extends it for another two years, until June 1, 2006.

    The new law makes several important changes to the J waiver program. First, it specifies that physicians who are sponsored for a waiver by either a federal or state agency will be exempt from the H-1B cap. In addition, the bill allows five of each state’s 30 waivers to go to doctors that practice medicine in areas not designated by the Secretary of HHS as having a shortage of health care professionals, if the doctors receiving the waivers practice in facilities that serve patients who reside in areas designated by the Secretary as having a shortage of health care professionals. Finally, the measure permits foreign doctors receiving a waiver to work in medically-underserved areas in either primary care or specialty medicine. Under current law, only state agencies and the Veteran's Administration are permitted to sponsor specialists. To request a waiver for a specialist, however, the interested agency would be required to demonstrate a shortage of doctors able to provide the appropriate medical specialty in the designated geographical area.

    [Back to Top]

     

    USCIS To Implement H-1B Visa Reform Act Of 2004

    New Law Changes Aspects of the Temporary Work Program

    Washington, D.C.– U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced today that President Bush has signed the Omnibus Appropriations Act for FY 2005, which contains provisions affecting the H-1B and L nonimmigrant visa categories. Both the H-1B and L programs allow U.S. employers to sponsor temporary foreign workers.

    New Fees

    Before October 1, 2003, employers who used the H-1B program were required to pay an additional $1,000 fee imposed by the American Competitiveness and Workforce Improvement Act of 1998 (ACWIA). In part, that $1,000 fee paid for U.S citizens, lawful permanent residents and other U.S. workers to attend job training and receive low-income scholarships or grants for mathematics, engineering or science enrichment courses administered by the National Science Foundation and the Department of Labor. Those ACWIA fee requirements sunset on October 1, 2003.

    The H-1B provisions of the Omnibus Appropriations Act reinstitutes the ACWIA fee and raises it to $1,500. Petitioners who employ no more than 25 full-time equivalent employees, including any affiliate or subsidiary, may submit a reduced fee of $750. Certain types of petitions, that were previously exempt from the $1,000 fee, are still exempt from the new $1,500 and $750 fee. The new $1,500 and $750 fee applies to any non-exempt petitions filed with USCIS after December 8, 2004.

    In addition, the Act creates a new Fraud Prevention and Detection Fee of $500 which must be paid by petitioners seeking a beneficiary’s initial grant of H-1B or L nonimmigrant classification or those petitioners seeking to change a beneficiary’s employer within those classifications. Other than petitions to amend or extend stay filed by an existing H-1B or L employer, there are no exemptions from the $500 fee. The new $500 fee applies to petitions filed with USCIS on or after March 8, 2005.

    Each of these fees is in addition to the base processing fee of $185 to file a Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker (Form I-129) and any premium processing fees, if applicable.

    H-1B Cap

    This Act, and Public Law 108-441 (Dec. 3, 2004), provides new exemptions from the congressionally mandated annual H-1B cap.

    1. ??he first 20,000 H-1B beneficiaries who have earned a master’s degree or higher from a U.S. institution of higher education are not subject to the annual congressionally mandated H-1B visa cap of 65,000. After those 20,000 slots are filled, USCIS is required to count those cases against the cap for the remainder of the fiscal year.
    2. ??or FY 2005, the new provision will allow USCIS to accept new petitions on behalf of up to 20,000 beneficiaries meeting these criteria. Petitions under this provision cannot be filed at this time, as the provision is not effective until March 8, 2005. USCIS will provide additional guidance on eligibility and process at a later date.
    3. ??ublic Law 108-441 extended the "Conrad 30" J-1 program covering certain medical graduates. Nonimmigrants currently in the United States on a J-1 (exchange) visa who receive a waiver of the two-year residency requirement if requested by either a federal or state agency are now exempt from the

    H-1B cap. Qualifying employers of these beneficiaries may submit H-1B petitions, notwithstanding the fact that the H-1B cap was already met for FY 2005, after December 8, 2004.

    Petitioners must separately evaluate whether an H-1B petitioner is exempt from certain fees and whether the petition is exempt from the H-1B cap, because the rules applicable to each type of exemption are not the same. For example, a petition by an otherwise non-exempt employer to extend the H-1B stay of a beneficiary for the first time would be exempt from the H-1B cap, but not from either the $1,500 or $750 fee.

    A separate press release covers changes to the L-1 program made by the Omnibus Appropriations Act for FY 2005.

    OMB Completes Final PERM Rule Review

    The Office of Management and Budget (OMB), which oversees regulatory policies for the Executive Branch, completed its review of the final PERM rule on Friday, December 10, 2004. This rule had been pending at the OMB since February 23, 2004. Upon completion of the final rule, the rule is forwarded for publication in the Federal Register, a process which can be as quick as a day, or can take several weeks. In light of the lengthy period during which the rule was pending at OMB, it is anticipated that publication in the Federal Register will be prompt.

    The effective date of the final PERM rule has not yet been confirmed, though the Department of Labor previously indicated that the effective date will be 60 days from the date of publication.

    Congress Snubs Bush's Immigration Plan

    WASHINGTON -- A battle between President Bush and Congress over immigration policies and related security concerns continues in the wake of lawmakers' approval of a hard-fought bill to revamp the nation's intelligence network.

    House leaders said Wednesday that Bush's immigration plan, including a 'guest worker' visa program for illegal immigrants already in the country, will not be part of their immigration measure early next year.

    The remarks came as the Senate on Wednesday voted 89-2 for the intelligence bill recommended by the commission that investigated the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the United States. Now the bill goes to the president for his signature.

    Though congressional hearings could be held later on Bush's immigration ideas, the House leadership's decision to limit the scope of the first bill next year underscores the opposition to some of the White House positions by House Judiciary Committee Chairman James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., and other House GOP conservatives.

    'I'm not going to talk about that,' Sensenbrenner said Wednesday about the guest worker provision.

    Sensenbrenner cast his own immigration bill as separate from Bush's package and aimed at preventing terrorism on American soil.

    'If you mix up immigration with national security, you're going to end up having both lose,' Sensenbrenner said.

    Complicating the immigration debate is a House decision to attach the next bill to the first 'must pass' legislation of the session that starts in January.

    That means immigration likely will be piggybacked on the White House's expected request for an additional $70 billion for military and reconstruction in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    Immigration concerns

    The immigration bill will cover three issues dropped from the intelligence measure:

    *Further tightening of driver's license standards, including a national ban on issuing licenses to illegal immigrants;

    *Raising the standard of proof for those seeking asylum;

    *Closing a three-mile gap in a fence along the California-Mexico border.

    'They game the immigration system in being able to get the driver's licenses, knowing that the driver's licenses didn't expire when their visas expired,' Sensebrenner said about some illegal immigrants. 'And there were some terrorists who were not involved in 9/11 that gamed the asylum system to get into the country and to plot terrorist attacks.'

    Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, who has introduced a bill that largely mirrors the president's goals, called Sensenbrenner's concerns valuable but incomplete. 'What I am looking for is to have a conversation about how (we) address this problem consistent with homeland security, knowing who is in our country and why they are here,' Cornyn said.

    During contentious negotiations in recent weeks, the Senate refused to consider these immigration provisions out of fear they would draw controversy and sink the intelligence bill. The White House signaled its support only for the asylum provision.

    The White House did not embrace Sensenbrenner's plan Wednesday.

    'What we've said is that we'll talk with Congress about these issues, and (Bush) looks forward to doing so early next year, and that it's important to consult closely with the states (on licenses) so that we can improve those standards,' spokesman Scott McClellan said.

    Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Houston, a Judiciary Committee member, said Sensebrenner is using national security as a way to drive an anti-immigration vote in the House.

    But, she said, 'there's no documentation to suggest that the unfortunate wave of illegal immigration based on economic considerations has generated a population of terrorists.'

    Visas and licenses

    Members of the Sept. 11 commission said the terrorist hijackers entered the country with fraudulently obtained documents and were considered legal immigrants when they received their driver's licenses.

    Texas and 38 other states require driver's license applicants to show they are legal residents. Texas and 26 other states do not require that the license expire when the driver's visa expires, according to the National Immigration Law Center.

    As recently as last month, Bush renewed his resolve to win approval of his guest worker plan.

    After a meeting in Chile with Mexican President Vicente Fox, he noted that immigrants often take jobs rejected by U.S. citizens.

    'It makes sense, not only for our economy — it makes sense for border security,' Bush said.

    [Back to Top